Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Many deck, yard, patio, and view photos; no confirmed aerial or hot tub/pool.; z19 shows the subject structure/lot area and surrounding homes/driveways; z20 is useful but tight and somewhat shadowed, z18 adds broader complex/road context. Google quality is adequate but not clearly better than typical Mapbox/Bing due to contrast/shadows.; Center/red tile shows the house area with adjacent driveway/lot, though imagery is blurry and partly obscured by trees.

Vision batch 003: print_mockup_potential=low; best_candidate_tile=none; All aerial tiles show 'Map data not yet available'; no property features visible.; Exterior, deck, patio/view, and treed outlook images; no true aerial; no visible pool/hot tub.; House and surrounding lot/backyard visible; some tree cover/shadow limits yard detail.; Center/red tile clearly shows the house footprint with surrounding yard/lot and adjacent driveway/road; some tree cover but usable.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no clear aerial/top-down images. Best available are ground-level exterior/yard views: photos 3 and 4 show house with lawn/lot context; photos 1-2 show front exterior.; Cul-de-sac home and lot visible; backyard/edges partly obscured by trees and shadows.; Center/red tile shows the likely house and nearby lot context, though property edges/backyard are somewhat unclear and partly mixed with neighboring homes.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial/top-down house+lot image. Ground-level exterior shots show house with lawn/yard; elevated deck/view images show outlook but not house and lot together.; Property context and lot are visible, but house/backyard are partly obscured by mature trees and shadows.; Center/red tile is mostly road/yard with no strong house view. Top-right and middle-left show houses with surrounding lot context; top-right appears clearest.

Vision batch 003: print_mockup_potential=low; best_candidate_tile=none; All aerial tiles show 'Map data not yet available'; no property features visible.; Goal review: no aerial/top-down. Photos 14-15 are elevated deck/view shots; 28-30 show yard/garden/lot areas from ground level. Limited combined house-backyard coverage.; z19 clearly shows house, yard, street frontage, driveway/parking, and neighboring context; z18 adds block context. Google quality is strong and likely better than typical Mapbox/Bing for this location.; Center tile is mostly roadway with only partial structures; surrounding tiles show fragments of nearby lots but no clear house + backyard/lot together.

Vision batch 003: print_mockup_potential=low; best_candidate_tile=none; All aerial tiles show 'Map data not yet available'; no property features visible.; Goal review: no aerial/top-down/elevated views. Multiple ground-level exterior views show rear/side yard and house together, especially photos 8-12.; z19 best balances house/lot context; z20 is too tight/soft and z18 adds neighborhood context. Backyard/lot partly obscured by trees. Google quality is roughly typical to slightly better than Mapbox/Bing for this rural/resort area.; Center tile mainly shows cul-de-sac/trees with no clear house; adjacent tiles contain partial houses but not a strong house + backyard/lot view.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no clear aerial/top-down/elevated shot showing house and backyard/lot together. Only front exteriors and deck/view shots.; z19 shows nearby house and lot context, but coordinate is near roadway/edge, so target parcel alignment is somewhat uncertain.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no true aerial/top-down/elevated house+yard view. Best available are front exterior and patio/deck/yard-adjacent views, but lot context is limited.; z20 shows house, driveway, and immediate lot area, though trees/shadows obscure some backyard detail.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial or elevated backyard/lot overview visible. Front/driveway/exterior shots show house and some landscaping only.; z19 gives best combined view of house, driveway, street frontage, and lot context; z20 is more cropped.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no clear aerial/top-down of house plus backyard/lot. Photo 10 is aerial/marina context but does not show the house/yard. Best usable are ground/elevated exterior/backyard angles.; House and surrounding lot/backyard are visible together; z20 is closer but softer/partly shadowed.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: only front exterior in wooded setting; does not show backyard/lot together from aerial or elevated angle.; House and lot context visible, but trees obscure parts of the yard and structure.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial/elevated exterior. Photo 1 shows front/lot from ground; photo 18 shows yard through/near window, but no combined house and backyard/lot aerial.; Clear top-down view of house, driveway, and yard/lot; z19 also gives good context.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial/top-down/elevated view visible. Ground-level exterior photos show house with lawn/yard and deck/wooded setting, but not comprehensive house-plus-backyard/lot coverage.; House/lot context is present, but tree cover and shadows limit visibility.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no true aerial/top-down. Photos 23-26 are elevated deck/yard views with partial house/lot context; photo 1 is front ground exterior. None clearly shows house and backyard/lot together from above.; z19 clearly captures house with surrounding lawn/yard and adjacent golf-course context; z20 useful but tighter.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial/top-down view showing house and lot together. Photos 4/15/16 are elevated/deck views of yard/trees but do not show the house. Closest house-plus-setting views are ground-level exteriors 5, 6, 1.; z19 shows house, driveway/road frontage, large yard/lot, and surrounding land context well; z20 is too tight for full context.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: several ground-level exterior/front/lot-view shots, especially photos 1-5, but no aerial/top-down/elevated house-plus-backyard coverage.; Clear overhead of house, lawn/backyard, driveway, and neighboring lot context.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial/elevated backyard or lot overview visible. Only front driveway/exterior context appears relevant.; House/lot appears partly visible near the road, but tree cover and off-center coordinate reduce usefulness.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial/top-down view. Ground-level exterior/backyard/patio shots show portions of house and yard/lot, but not an elevated overall house-plus-backyard view.; z19 shows the house area in neighborhood context with surrounding lot/backyard visible; z20 is too tight/partly off-center, z18 gives broader context but less detail.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no true aerial/top-down/elevated lot view. Best candidates are ground-level exterior/front and deck/covered outdoor view; backyard/lot context limited.; Property area is visible but partly obscured by trees/shadow; z19 provides best balance of house/lot and immediate surroundings.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: only ground-level front exterior views appear; no visible aerial/elevated backyard or lot overview showing house and yard together.; Dwelling/cluster and surrounding drive/treed lot context visible, though dense trees and neighboring structures reduce backyard clarity. z19 is best overall.

Vision batch 002: print_mockup_potential=low; best_candidate_tile=none; Map data not available; no imagery to evaluate.; z19 shows the structure with surrounding lot/yard context; z20 is too tight/soft and z18 is broader but less detailed.

Vision batch 003: print_mockup_potential=low; best_candidate_tile=none; All aerial tiles show 'Map data not yet available'; no property features visible.; Good elevated view showing house, lot context, street access, and nearby lake; z18 gives broader neighborhood/water context.

Vision batch 003: print_mockup_potential=low; best_candidate_tile=none; All aerial tiles show 'Map data not yet available'; no property features visible.; House and lot/backyard visible with good neighborhood context; minor tree shadow.

Vision batch 003: print_mockup_potential=low; best_candidate_tile=none; All aerial tiles show 'Map data not yet available'; no property features visible.; Good view of house, yard, driveway, and lot boundaries; z20 also usable but tighter.

Vision batch 003: print_mockup_potential=low; best_candidate_tile=none; All aerial tiles show 'Map data not yet available'; no property features visible.; House and surrounding lot/backyard context visible; some tree/shadow obstruction.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; House and surrounding yard/lot are clearly visible; z20 is detailed but tighter.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; House/lot context visible, including yard and bluff area; trees obscure some detail.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; House/lot context visible, though trees and shadows obscure parts of the backyard.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; House and surrounding yard/lot context are visible; z19 balances detail and full-property context.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; House area and surrounding road/lot context visible, but tree cover partially obscures yard boundaries.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Clear elevated/top-down view of house, driveway, neighboring lots, and usable yard/lot context.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; House, road frontage, and surrounding lot/neighborhood context visible; some trees but still useful.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; House and surrounding lot are visible, but trees/shadows obscure parts of yard; z19 gives best balance of structure and lot context.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Clear top-down view of house, lawn, driveway, and lot surroundings; z20 is strongest.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Clear top-down view of house, driveway, surrounding lawn/lot; z19 adds useful neighborhood context.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Very clear overhead of house, driveway, front/side yard and lot boundaries; z19 also useful.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; House and wooded lot context are visible; z19 balances structure visibility and lot coverage, though trees obscure much of the backyard.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Clear overhead of house, driveway, yard, and lot boundaries/road context; z20 is most useful with good detail.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: ground-level front exterior only; remaining thumbnails are interiors. No house-plus-backyard/lot aerial candidate.; Clear suburban overhead showing house, driveway, yard, cul-de-sac, and lot context; z19 gives full lot plus surrounding context, z20 gives close detail.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; House and lot are visible, but trees/shadows obscure portions of the yard; z19 balances detail and context.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Shows cul-de-sac setting with nearby houses/lots; subject location appears road-adjacent and partly obscured by trees. z19 gives best context.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Useful overhead of apparent construction/lot area with surrounding context; finished house/backyard not clearly visible. z20 has best detail.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Good overhead view of home, driveway/parking, lot area, and surrounding parcels; z19 balances detail and full-lot context.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; House/lot area visible with surrounding roads and nearby homes, but tree canopy and shadows obscure much of the backyard/lot detail.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: contact sheet appears to show only interiors; no exterior, backyard, lot, aerial, or elevated house/lot view visible.; House and lot context visible, but backyard/edges are partly obscured by trees and long shadows.

Vision batch 002: print_mockup_potential=low; best_candidate_tile=none; Wooded rural setting with property mostly hidden by trees; no visible backyard focal point.; Goal review: no true aerial/top-down house+lot view. Strong ground-level yard/lot coverage with house visible in photos 2, 3, 6; photos 13/15/24 are elevated/deck-style views but mostly yard/lake rather than full house+backyard together.; Heavily treed and blurry; possible roof/clearing at right side of center tile, but house and backyard/lot are not clearly visible together.; z19/z18 show house, driveway, surrounding treed lot/backyard context together; z20 is too tight/obscured by trees. Google quality decent but tree canopy/shadows limit detail; roughly typical to slightly better than many Mapbox/Bing rural sheets.; Imagery is blurry and heavily tree-obscured. Top-left appears to show a roof with some surrounding lot, but backyard/lot context is weak; center/red tile does not clearly show the house.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Strong backyard/lawn and deck images; photo 29 appears to show a covered hot tub on deck. Needs human verification before relying on it.; Center/red tile mostly shows road bend and trees with only partial/obscured structures near edges; target house and lot are not clearly visible together.; z19 shows the house and surrounding lot/backyard context together; z20 is close but shadowed/partly cropped, z18 gives broader neighborhood context. Google quality appears typical to slightly worse than ideal Mapbox/Bing due to heavy tree shadows.; Residential area is visible; center/red tile shows a house edge, street frontage, yard, and adjacent lot context. Some blur/cropping limits full property view.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Good lawn/backyard/deck inventory; hot tub clearly visible in photo 28. Needs human verification before relying on it.; Clear top-down view with house, yard, driveway, adjacent trees, and lot context visible; z20 also detailed but slightly tight, z18 good for neighborhood context. Google quality looks strong and likely better than many typical Mapbox/Bing sheets.; Center/red tile clearly shows a house with surrounding yard/lot, driveway/access, and adjacent structures. Best candidate among this group.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Exterior, patio/railing views, and scenic outlook shots; no clear drone/aerial or pool/hot tub.; z19 cleanly captures the house, lot, cul-de-sac frontage, neighboring homes, and forest edge; z20 is detailed but tighter, z18 gives excellent wider setting. Google quality appears good and likely comparable to or better than typical Mapbox/Bing.; Center/red tile clearly captures the house within its cleared lot, with surrounding yard/forest context visible.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Multiple exterior/courtyard/deck views, but no clear drone/aerial or water feature.; z19 shows house/driveway and surrounding lot reasonably well; trees and mixed rural clutter reduce clarity. Google quality comparable to typical Mapbox/Bing.; Red center tile includes the apparent house at lower edge plus surrounding yard/lot, but imagery is soft/blurry and partially tree-covered.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial/top-down/elevated views. Wide ground-level exterior shots show house, detached garage, yard/lot, and treed surroundings; photos 3 and 6 are strongest.; Large lot, house, outbuildings, and surrounding yard are clearly visible.; Center/red tile provides a good overhead view of house, outbuilding/drive area, yard, and surrounding treed lot.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Multiple exterior/front/yard angles; no aerial or amenity water feature visible.; House and lot visible with useful context; some mature trees/shadow obscure parts of yard.; Center/red tile shows the home, yard, street frontage, and nearby structures; useful but somewhat cluttered by road crossing and neighboring parcels.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Cabin exterior and wooded setting shots; no clear drone/aerial or hot tub/pool.; Clear overhead of house, driveway, surrounding yard/lot; trees obscure some rear/side areas but overall useful.; Center/red tile is mostly road/trees and does not clearly show the house. Bottom-middle or top-left offer partial house + lot context, but imagery is blurry/obscured.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Outdoor marketing mostly front/exterior and walkway/yard context; limited backyard content in visible set.; Shows house, street frontage, and surrounding lot context; z20 is too tight/partly offset, while z19 gives better overall coverage.; Center/red tile is dominated by intersection/road with only partial structures. Top-middle gives the best house + lot/yard overhead context, though somewhat soft.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Multiple exterior/yard angles and driveway/porch shots; no clear drone or water feature.; Clear view of house, yard, driveway, and lot boundaries/context; z19 also useful for neighborhood setting.; Center/red tile clearly shows the house, yard/lot, driveway, and street context; best candidate.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Winter exterior/yard photos only; limited outdoor marketing beyond front/side views.; z19 shows house and surrounding lot/backyard context clearly; z20 is closer but softer/cropped.; Center/red tile shows the likely house, front/side yard, driveway/road context, but structure is partly near tile edge and imagery is soft.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: photo 4 is an elevated/scenic area view, not clearly the property. Property photos are mostly ground-level exterior/front/rear; photo 5 shows rear deck/house but limited lot context.; Clear overhead view of house, driveway, lot, and surrounding golf-course/treed context; z20 is tighter and more cropped.; Center/red tile is mostly road/trees and not useful for a house+yard view; bottom-left tile shows a house with surrounding lot more clearly.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial/top-down/elevated exterior photos visible. Only ground-level front/entry exterior views; backyard/lot context is minimal.; z19 clearly shows house, driveway, backyard/lot, and cul-de-sac context; z20 is closer but less complete.; Center/red tile shows houses and backyard/lot areas together with good neighborhood context; some tree shadow but generally usable.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Snowy exterior/yard/garage shots plus gazebo/deck area; no clear drone; possible covered spa/gazebo but hot tub not clearly visible.; Clear top-down view of house, yard, neighboring lots, road access, and open lot context; z20 good for structure, z19 best balance. Google quality appears better than typical Mapbox/Bing here: sharp, bright, low obstruction.; Red center tile is mostly road/driveway/trees with only building edge nearby; bottom-center has a house/lot view but may not be the target property.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial/top-down or clear backyard/lot overview. Early exterior shots show house/front/entry; photo 4 is porch/deck view with wooded setting but limited lot context.; z19 best balances house, driveway, road, and wooded lot/backyard context; z20 is tight/soft and z18 is broader. Tree cover obscures parts of the lot. Google quality is average to slightly worse than typical Mapbox/Bing high-res sheets due to softness/shadow/tree obstruction.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial/top-down/elevated backyard coverage visible. Only exterior candidate is front/yard photo 1; no useful backyard/lot-together view on sheet.; Clear top-down suburban view; z19 shows house, front drive, backyard/lot, and neighboring context. z20 is usable but tighter. Google quality is good and likely comparable to or slightly better than typical Mapbox/Bing.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: only visible exterior candidate is front/driveway view; no backyard/lot-together aerial or elevated view.; z19 clearly captures the house, lot, yard, street corner/context; z20 is close but still somewhat useful. Google quality is good/comparable to typical Mapbox/Bing, with minor roof/shadow blur.