Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Strong exterior/yard and mountain-view seating shots; no aerial or hot tub/pool visible.; Center/red tile shows street, driveway/structures, and nearby yards; useful neighborhood/lot context, though the likely house/backyard is partly cropped and somewhat blurry.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: many ground-level exterior/patio/yard views showing house and yard context; no aerial or top-down/elevated overview.; Center/red tile includes the house, driveway, and surrounding residential lot context; somewhat soft but usable.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial or elevated view. Exterior photos 26-30 show house with fenced yard/lot context from ground level; 29-30 appear best for house plus yard together.; Red center tile is mostly roadway with only partial property edge; middle-left gives the clearest house-and-yard context.

Vision batch 002: print_mockup_potential=low; best_candidate_tile=none; Center tile shows roadway and pale open ground; no usable backyard scene.; Goal review: no aerial/top-down shot, but several wide exterior ground-level photos show house with large surrounding lawn/lot; photos 7 and 6 are strongest for house+yard context.; Red center tile is mainly road/vacant ground, but bottom-center shows a clear house with driveway and lot/backyard area.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial/elevated view visible. Wide ground-level yard/driveway/rear exterior shots give some sense of lot, but not top-down.; Red center tile shows the house, yard/driveway, and surrounding lot well, though partly shaded by trees.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no true aerial/top-down. Photos 26-30 are the best available elevated/backyard-view candidates showing yard/lot context and views, but little to no full house-plus-backyard together.; Center/red tile includes the likely residence, yard, and street context; usable but slightly soft/blurred with partial tree/shadow interference.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial. Several ground-level exterior/deck/yard views show house-adjacent outdoor areas and lot feel, but not a top-down overview.; Center/red tile shows driveway/trees and only partial building context. Bottom-middle provides the clearest house + surrounding lot view.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no drone/top-down. Several ground-level yard shots show house plus large lot/backyard well; photo 20 appears elevated/front-window view but not backyard-focused.; Center/red tile gives a clear overhead of house, yard, driveway, and street context; good house-plus-lot candidate.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial/top-down view. Good ground-level yard and rear/side house views, including lawn, hedge, patio, and lot edges.; Center/red tile includes house and treed yard/lot, though tree cover and partial edge placement reduce clarity.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no true aerial. Multiple exterior house-and-yard views; photo 24 is an elevated/deck view outward, useful for context but not a full house/backyard overview.; Center/red tile captures house, adjacent yard, driveway/access, and surrounding lot context well.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial/top-down/elevated lot overview visible. Only front exterior and deck/porch views; backyard/lot not shown together with house.; Center/red tile is mostly road with only partial adjacent properties; right-middle tile provides the best house-plus-yard/lot view.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: photos 3/4 are elevated/scenic mountain views but do not show house with backyard/lot; only front exterior context visible.; Center tile shows backyard/lot and part of the house, though the structure is partially cut off at the right edge and tree cover reduces clarity.

Vision batch 001: print_mockup_potential=low; best_candidate_tile=none; Center tile is dominated by cul-de-sac pavement with only partial neighboring structures and lawns.; Goal review: no clear aerial/top-down house-plus-yard image. Exterior and deck/yard photos provide partial ground-level context only.; Center/red tile mainly shows cul-de-sac/driveways with only partial buildings; bottom-left has a better house+yard view, but target coverage is uncertain.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no aerial/top-down images. Front exterior and rear/yard snow views exist, but they do not show house and backyard/lot together from above.; Center/red tile shows the likely house and rear yard/lot context, though imagery is somewhat blurry.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Goal review: no true aerial/top-down/elevated view visible. Best candidates are ground-level exterior shots showing house with portions of yard/lot; backyard/lot context is limited.; Center/red tile captures house, driveway/street, and yard area together; resolution is soft but usable.

Automated placeholder detection: all aerial tiles appear to be Esri no-imagery placeholders; use MLS/contact-sheet path instead.; Only one clear exterior/front-yard shot; remainder appears interior-focused.; Center/red tile shows property along the road with house/yard context; lot shape and backyard are somewhat indistinct due to blur.